In the ongoing debate on Ripple (XRP) and its intrinsic value, attorney Deaton’s response to Australian-based lawyer Bill Morgan’s criticism of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) stance has sparked further discussion.

The central point of contention lies in whether XRP possesses intrinsic value, a question that holds significant implications for the regulatory classification of the cryptocurrency.

Maybe the SEC should read Howey again:

“The test is whether the scheme involves an investment of money in a common enterprise with profits to come solely from the efforts of others. If that test be satisfied, it is immaterial whether the enterprise is speculative or… pic.twitter.com/qr1yqyhLRo

— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) August 28, 2023

• Morgan’s critique of the SEC centers on its argument that XRP lacks intrinsic value. This argument was purportedly presented during the summary judgment phase of the Ripple case, as well as in the SEC’s request to submit an amicus brief.
• The agency’s position on XRP’s intrinsic value is crucial as it influences whether the token is considered a security under the Howey test.
• Deaton responded to Morgan’s criticism by advocating for a reexamination of the Howey test – a legal standard used in the United States to determine whether certain transactions qualify as investment contracts and, thus, securities.
• In support of his stance, attorney Deaton referenced a specific portion of the Howey test, emphasizing that the essence of the test lies in determining whether a scheme encompasses investing money in a joint venture where profits are derived solely from the endeavors of others.
• If thi