The Supreme Court’s choice to take up this case represents a pivotal development for firms utilizing arbitration clauses.
The United States Supreme Court has taken up a legal dispute concerning Coinbase and its users, specifically addressing a significant procedural matter on whether a judge or an arbitrator should decide which contract governs disputes.
According to a report from Bloomberg, this issue stems from conflicting agreements between the parties, with one contract advocating arbitration and another supporting courtroom litigation.
Coinbase had initially applied arbitration clauses to its clients, but a complication arose with a sweepstakes agreement that directed dispute resolution to California courts. Following allegations of deceptive advertising, customers pursued legal action through a class-action lawsuit, contesting Coinbase’s usual arbitration process.
Coinbase’s efforts to promote arbitration faced opposition in lower courts. A federal judge in California, backed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, affirmed that the sweepstakes agreement, which favored courtroom resolution, should prevail. As a result, the company’s request to move the dispute to arbitration was not granted.
Related: Coinbase narrows loss, while crypto trading volumes fall in Q3
This judicial reluctance comes despite a recent Supreme Court decision, which leaned 5–4 in favor
Go to Source to See Full Article
Author: Amaka Nwaokocha
Tip BTC Newswire with Cryptocurrency
Donate Bitcoin to BTC Newswire
Donate Bitcoin Cash to BTC Newswire
Donate Ethereum to BTC Newswire
Donate Litecoin to BTC Newswire
Donate Monero to BTC Newswire
Donate ZCash to BTC Newswire
