On Jan. 2, X (formerly Twitter) user Domo, creator of the Bitcoin BRC-20 token standard, said he would oppose an upcoming fork proposed by UniSat Wallet.
“I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless,” said Domo. “[They] disregard their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users.”
Recognizing the serious implications and valuations involved, I believe rushing these updates in BRC20 is reckless, disregards their peer indexers, and could potentially harm the broader community of BRC20 users. The 0.8/0.9 incident highlighted the complexities of integrating… https://t.co/RccP7bYdVY
— domo (@domodata) January 2, 2024
The creator then highlighted recent bugs involving the Ordinals 0.8 and 0.9 updates as part of the growing complexities of integrating new updates into the BRC-20 standard. “It is clear these changes may not be safe to integrate without the robust testing, coordination, and validation infrastructure that is currently being built,” Domo wrote while also alleging that UniSat’s fork proposal is “part of a considered, ongoing strategy to gain control of the protocol.”
UniSat has since clarified that its proposed “fork” is actually a “split” that separates BRC-20 version 0.9 assets from the upcoming Ordinals Jubilee upgrade with “different sets with different rules, but still residing in a same physical blockchain.” “UniSat will follow the Ordinals Jubilee upgrade, to confirm that BRC-20 is still on Ordinals without splitting into an isolated protocol,” developers wrote and teased a new white paper detailing protocol enhancements to be released on Jan. 31.
We were asked: What do you
Go to Source to See Full Article
Author: Zhiyuan Sun
Tip BTC Newswire with Cryptocurrency
Donate Bitcoin to BTC Newswire
Donate Bitcoin Cash to BTC Newswire
Donate Ethereum to BTC Newswire
Donate Litecoin to BTC Newswire
Donate Monero to BTC Newswire
Donate ZCash to BTC Newswire
