OkThe AI-driven momentum across crypto reflects how far decentralization has evolved.
What started as an attempt to decentralize financial infrastructure, allowing peer-to-peer transactions without intermediaries, has now expanded into blockchain networks integrating AI to speed up systems.
In this context, the recent FUD around Bittensor [TAO] seems largely sentiment-driven. For context, Covenant AI, one of the largest and most active subnets on Bittensor, recently exited the network, sparking uncertainty.
However, the bigger concern isn’t just the exit itself, but the reasoning behind it. In a post on X, Covenant AI said that Bittensor no longer functions as a truly decentralized network.
The team argued that key decisions remain influenced by centralized authority. They claimed network leadership suspended subnet emissions and removed community control. The team also said leadership deprecated infrastructure and applied economic pressure through token sales.
In their view, these actions suggest centralized control operating behind a decentralization narrative. The team clarified,
We cannot raise capital, attract talent, or ask our community to commit resources on top of a foundation that one person can undermine at will. That is not a risk we are willing to pass on to the people who trust us.
Naturally, this raises a key question: Is the FUD around TAO simply sentiment-driven, or does it reflect deeper structural concerns within the network?
TAO extends losses as Bittensor faces growing structural scrutiny
The 2026 cycle has increasingly challenged the notion that AI is merely another hype-driven narrative.
Instead, market data suggests that capital rotation toward AI-focused projects remains structurally strong.
From a technical standpoint, Bitcoin [BTC] recorded only a modest 2.14% increase in monthly market cap. In contrast, the AI token sector has shown significantly stronger expansion.
According to CoinMarketCap data, the combined market cap of AI-related tokens climbed nearly 13%, while trading volume surged close to 70% over the same period.
TAO’s quarterly performance reinforces this trend, with the AI token rallying nearly 40%, while Bitcoin posted a 22.04% Q1 decline. In this context, the recent pullback in TAO highlights emerging structural weakness.
Following Covenant AI’s exit from Bittensor, TAO extended intraday losses by 13.3%, bringing total losses to nearly 25% within 72 hours of trading.
As a result, much of the earlier bullish momentum, including the $43 million Q1 revenue narrative and Grayscale ETF filing optimism, has been largely unwound.
According to AMBCrypto, this is where the AI narrative comes into play. As noted earlier, recent capital flows into AI tokens, including TAO, continue to signal strong investor interest in AI-focused decentralized projects and the broader shift toward AI-driven crypto infrastructure.
However, Covenant AI’s exit from Bittensor has clearly challenged this narrative. From a technical standpoint, this makes TAO’s weakness appear less like a short-term shakeout and more like a structural concern.
Thus, the recent drawdown could mark the beginning of a deeper downside trend for TAO.
Final Summary
- AI-driven momentum across crypto is strengthening, with capital rotation into AI tokens showing rising market interest and faster growth than broader assets like BTC.
- However, Covenant AI’s exit from Bittensor has raised structural concerns. TAO’s recent sharp drawdown suggests the weakness may be more than just a short-term shakeout.
Go to Source to See Full Article
Author: Ritika Gupta
